A Tangled Web
When I read little news blurbs like this one: “Reliant Mermaid”, a joint search and rescue exercise will be performed by naval and air forces of Turkey, Israel and the United States between August 20th and 24th”, and Turkey will host the exercise, I have to wonder if anyone anywhere is telling even a small part of the truth.
My last post was about the increasing massing of troops on the Turkey/Iraq Kurdestan Province border, and how, according to MSM news sources, it looks like war between the U.S. and Turkey, and that there’s a call out to reinstate the military draft as a direct result of this.
Now, it is true that one of the primary roles of the Turkish military is to keep their government secular, that is, to prevent it from becoming Islamist, so I can see their military sharing in joint operations with us and other nations. Yet this is the same military that’s supposedly threatening us over Iraq, and Israel will also be a part of these exercises?
I wondered why Bush would continue to be protective of the Kurds when the plain fact is that without them the war there would be a whole lot less complicated. The biggest sticking point in that morass of a government coming to a workable agreement over ruling Iraq is that the Kurds want autonomy and Kurdestan sits on 40% of the known, untapped oil reserves of the country. None of the other parties wants the Kurds to have all that oil, which is why the Iraqi government continues to be in disarray.
So doesn’t it make sense from a purely greedy and heartless point of view, to see the annihilation of the Kurds as a good and uniting thing? If the Turks came roaring in and wiped them out and turned the occupation back over to the Iraqis, then they could come to an agreement over distribution of the countrys oil wealth, which would solidify their government. George Bush would then have his victory, as the American and British oil companies could then begin exploiting the oil and the troops could focus in on Iran and Pakistan, and many of them could leave Iraq.
Referring to the pending Kirkuk Referendum, if the Kurds were granted this promised autonomous state of Kurdestan, that, as stated in my last post, would give the Turks their cause to not just attack the PKK but all of Kurdestan. Therefor, the Kirkuk Referendum is a setup for wiping out the Kurds. By giving them what they want, their doom is sealed. Bush is only pretending to be a friend of the Kurds, and no doubt he’s telling them right now that he’ll protect them against the Turks. This is how it looks.
At the same time, Bush’s current Brain may be threatening the Iraqi government leaders with an autonomous Kurdestan to leverage them into achieving consensus, proving that our people can be just as devious as any Arab.
If the draft is reinstated, and I predict it will be, it will be to fight Iran and Pakistan and possibly Syria. This would fit right in with the deal to sell billions in high-tech arms to Saudi Arabia, who would probably come in against Iran.
It still looks like the Turks are going to create the onset of a Middle-East war, only now the scenario is a lot different and the attack on the Kurds would be a signal that the war is beginning and not the beginning itself.
What we have here looks like a plan to dominate the oil-rich nations of Iran and Iraq, that is just now beginning to unfold. The Saudis and the Bush family are well known to be very thick with each other, so we can be sure that the Saudis will have a large post-war role to play in all this. What that may be, someone else can guess at. For me, this is “yet to be revealed.”
This would make a great mystery novel.
August 16th, 2007 at 11:16 am
Rastaman: You answered your own question:
“I wondered why Bush would continue to be protective of the Kurds…”
” … the Kurds want autonomy and Kurdestan sits on 40% of the known, untapped oil reserves”
Also with the killing of almost 500 Yazidi sect members, mostly Kurds, some are asking why Bush is allowing the extermination of this group of people. Like he really has control in the North? That’s like saying why does Bush allow al-Qaeda, Shia, Shiites, to continue killing each other. We don’t have control.
August 17th, 2007 at 3:27 am
“We don’t have control.”
Indeed we don’t!!!!!!!
You may find this article interesting, and begin to wonder why.
And then think………….just maybe they can be monitored easier this way.
So……………. if we are monitoring, WTF are we not more pro-active.
http://memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=IA37407
A close monitoring of CAIR personnel, and wire/mobile/house bugging would lay out the picture, of-spring of muslim brotherhood/hamas, etc
You got to wonder.