It’s Focus Time
The U.S. military believes 45 percent of all foreign militants are Saudi, another 15 percent are from Syria and Lebanon and 10 percent from North Africa, according to official U.S. military figures.
About 160 Saudi militants have been tried in Iraq for taking part in its insurgency, while hundreds of others are in detention, a top Iraqi official told a local newspaper Sunday.
15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers were Saudis. The Saudis are dominated by an extremely militant and repressive form of Islam called Wahhabism. Bin Laden is Wahhabist as are the Taliban and Al Qaeda. The Saudis, these Wahhabists, are funding mosques and religious schools called madrassas, all over the United States and Europe. These Saudi funded schools teach young people to become radical Wahhabist muslims. The priests in the mosques (imams) preach terrorist tactics and the overthrow of our governments.
Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan supports the terrorist group Mujahedin Khalq Organization and also al-Qaeda and Fath al-Islam now operating in Lebanon. Prince Bandar donated $750,000 to the exiled terrorist group.
The Bush family and Prince Bandar are extremely chummy. Since9/11, Bush has spoken twice at the Islamic Center in Washington DC, praising moderate muslims. This is a joke since the Center is Wahhabist and Saudi funded, primarily by Bandar, the supporter of terrorists and Bush family friend. No foreign diplomat has been closer or had more access to President Bush, his family and his administration than the magnetic and fabulously wealthy Prince Bandar bin Sultan of Saudi Arabia.
Do you like conspiracy theories? Try this one: A Lebanese source has revealed that Prince Bandar Bin Sultan is attempting to organize a coup against Saudi King Abdullah as part of a US plot.
“The US is planning a military takeover of Saudi Arabia before it pulls out its troops from Iraq,” the head of the Center for Modern Oriental Studies and Media in Lebanon Naser Qandil alleged in an interview with Aljazeera late Tuesday.”
With that swarm of Wahhabist madmen holding so much power there? Their hatred of us infidels is why we aren’t based there anymore. While you shouldn’t hold your breath waiting for this one, it is a real indicator of how the Bush-Bandar relationship is seen by Arab muslims. Consider how Bush remains non-responsive as the sponsors of the 9/11 terrorism that gave his presidency so much power continue to invade America.
Our focus should be on the Saudis and it should stay on the Saudis. They are the source of nearly all the terrorism being spread around the globe and they need to be stopped.
The Saudi royal family has enjoyed the protection of our government since the 1930s, and for a long time it worked well. Islam stayed pretty much in the Mid-East and the oil flowed to everyones benefit. Now things have changed with the rise to power of Wahhabism. The Saudis remain the royal family only by going along with the extremists and the extremists demand that much of the oil wealth go to promoting global Islamic extremism.
Western governments have been appeasing these extremists to assure continued oil imports and in the process have been the victims of their own purchases as the Saudi profits have been used to attack and destroy their governments.
Time to sharpen our focus and go after the source of terrorism by all means at hand, military, political and financial, and stop focusing on “possible” economical hardships as a reason to keep showing our white underbellies.
July 15th, 2007 at 6:44 pm
THAT’S THE FIRST DEADLY SIN OF GEORGE W BUSH:
In 2001, he didn’t attack Islamism as the real within enemy in 11 of September. And permits islamonazists publications, that prepare the war against the population , disseminated by the Saudi Arabia in libraries of mosques, streets and bookstores for American muslims.
They are preaching the destruction of America with anti-American antichristian, anti-Jewish, misogynistic, jihadist and supremacist ideology.
Obvious: Bush family has oil business with the Saudi real family. Can we trust in a leader sharing interests with the enemy?
July 15th, 2007 at 6:44 pm
8 British muslims policemen are fanatics linked to Al Qaeda (but nobody dares sack them)
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23403288-details/Al+Qaeda+fanatics+working+in+police+(but+they+don’t+dare+sack+them)/article.do
Some are even believed to have attended terror training camps in Pakistan or Afghanistan.
Their names feature on a secret list of alleged radicals said to be working in the Metropolitan and other forces…..
We can also reveal that one suspected jihadist officer working in the South East has been allowed to keep his job despite being caught circulating Internet images of beheadings and roadside bombings in Iraq.
Religious satanic hobby.
He is said to have argued that he was trying to “enhance” debate about the war.”
This situation shows how far Britain has fallen. Not so long ago, these men would have been arrested and charged with treason. Have the European and British people woken up that their own governments are the real enemy?
Britain, RIP
July 16th, 2007 at 12:27 am
Good post, Rasta.
Saudi should be at the top of the hit-list.
Ernesto, the situation in Britain is far worse than you imagine.
Sir Mark Malloch-Brown.
In 2006, ostensibly for his services to Britain, Sir Mark Malloch Brown was made a Knight Commander of St. Michael and St. George — a KCMG — by the queen of England….The son of a South African diplomat, Mark Brown was born and grew up in Zimbabwe (when it was known as Rhodesia), was educated in England at Marlborough College and took a history degree at Magdalene College, Cambridge.
From the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. On May 20 2007
“And if like Soros, you make several fortunes from international dealing, what and where is the best information found? The offices and committee rooms of the United Nations in New York and the World Bank Group in Washington. Hence, it was no surprise when, early this month, Soros announced that he was bringing into his organization an old friend, as vice chairman to himself, who had filled a number of posts over the years, through which it was possible to have contributed to the collection of the Soros billions.
The posts involved deputy secretary-general of the United Nations, chief of Cabinet to the U.N. secretary-general and administrator of the United Nations Development Programme. Earlier posts included vice president for External Affairs at the World Bank and the bank’s director of External Affairs. In preparation for these elite appointments was a 10-year stint with an international consulting group that specialized in advice to reformist and socialist candidates for heads of state in Latin America, Eastern Europe and Asia.
Each and every one of these posts has been held by a good friend of George Soros, Sir Mark Malloch Brown.
In 2006, ostensibly for his services to Britain, Sir Brown was made a Knight Commander of St. Michael and St. George — a KCMG — by the queen of England….The son of a South African diplomat, Mark Brown was born and grew up in Zimbabwe (when it was known as Rhodesia), was educated in England at Marlborough College and took a history degree at Magdalene College, Cambridge.
He now lives with his wife, Patricia (‘Trish’ to George Soros and other friends), who is a vice chairman of Refugees International, and their four children in a five-bedroom house on a near-five-acre estate in Katonah, in upstate New York. The estate belongs to George Soros, who charges Mark $10,000 a month rent, some $5,000 less than a previous tenant.
‘Sir’ Mark querulously defends this rent by saying that he pays the utilities. As of now, Brown is ‘interacting’ with Yale University students and faculty at the Yale Center for the Study of Globalization as a distinguished visiting fellow. Instead of concentrating on writing a book on globalization, he had been in Washington leading the charge against former World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz.
Brown told a large audience at World Bank headquarters that the bank’s ‘mission’ was ‘hugely at risk’ as long as Wolfowitz remained; by his very presence, the British knight also was saying: ‘Here I am, ethically pure, eminently qualified and ready — right now to become your leader.’
Too bad Brown has a short memory.
Last year, speaking of the United Nations, Mark Malloch Brown insisted, “Not a penny was lost from the organization.” This, after an audit through which it was shown that the United Nations had lost $7 million from overpayments; $61 million was found to have bypassed U.N. rules; $82 million was lost to mismanagement; and $110 million was rated as having “insufficient” justification. This adds up to $260 million out of a $1.6 billion budget.
Naturally, Brown also wants to forget the Oil-for-Food scandals, where he said that his boss at the United Nations, Kofi Annan, had been ‘fully exonerated.’ A totally untrue statement, Brown described calls for Annan’s resignation as ‘inappropriate political assassination.’
Among many other items in his life, which Brown would prefer no longer to be reminded of, is a speech he made at Pace University in 2005. Speaking of the United States, he said: ‘This ungainly giant of a nation that has led the world in advancing freedom, democracy and decency cannot quite accept membership in the global neighborhood association; that it must abide by others’ rules as well as its own.’ He noted that Washington already has set itself apart in its opposition to the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol on global warming”
Malloch Brown is indeed more than a friend to Soros. As the Financial Times reported last month:
“Sir Mark Malloch Brown, who recently stepped down as deputy secretary-general of the United Nations, has been appointed vice-chairman of his friend George Soros’s hedge fund company. Sir Mark will also serve as vice-chairman of the billionaire philanthropist’s Open Society Institute, which promotes democracy and human rights, particularly in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union”
Claudia Rosett who has her own blog, has this to say http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/675mviot.asp
And the WSJ has this to say http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010050
More disturbing still is the arrival in Brown’s UK government of the former United Nations deputy Secretary-General, Sir Mark Malloch Brown, who has been granted a peerage in order to take up the post of minister for Africa, Asia and the UN. As we know, the UN’s corruption and the way it has been turned into a mouthpiece for some of the world’s greatest tyrannies make it an urgent candidate for root-and-branch reform. Yet Malloch Brown actually actually defended the UN over the oil-for-food scandal. He also played a key and disreputable role in the Wolfowitz witch-hunt at the World Bank, blaming Wolfowitz’s anti-corruption drive for a loss of funding. He has blamed the Iraq war for disrupting aid to the world’s needy, by identifying such aid as serving Western interests rather than universal values. The Wolfowitz affair at the world bank conveniently distracted attention from a corruption scandal at the U.N. Development Program on Malloch Brown’s watch. UNDP officials were apparently up to their necks in corruption scams stretching from North Korea to Zimbabwe. And all this was going on while the UNDP was run by Malloch Brown.
George Soros is, of course, the billionaire funder of campaigns against George Bush and the Iraq war and the man who also backs the legalisation of drugs and thus the enslavement of millions. He now has his man in the heart of the British government. What on earth does Gordon Brown think he is doing?
But it gets better.
On Sunday, May 27th, Ghazi Hamad, spokesman of the Palestinian government headed by Ismail Haniya of Hamas, was the honored guest at a prestigious English literary festival at Hay-on-Wye in Wales. Invited to the event by the British Guardian newspaper, the Palestinian terrorist shared a platform with future and past British premiers, Chancellor Gordon Brown, who enters 10 Downing on June 27, John Major, the designer Vivienne Westwood and other glitterati. The Palestinian jihadi starred in Sky television’s Adam Bolton’s Sunday interview program.
Hamad rewarded his British hosts with a pack of lies and omissions, telling them what they wanted to hear about the fate of BBC correspondent Alan Johnston, was kidnapped on March 12 in Gaza City
Hamad is important in the Hamas Islamist terror machine in his capacity as director of the smuggling routes of funds and weapons from Damascus and Tehran through Egyptian Sinai. The money is spent on the manufacture of the Qassam missiles which day by day terrorize the Israeli civilian population abutting on Gaza. Some of the cash arrives in the infamous suitcases whose passage is allowed by the international observers posted at the Rafah crossing from Sinai.
But it still gets better.
Some of the foreign BBC staff are quite open about their sympathies for Hamas. The senior BBC Arabic Service correspondent in the Gaza Strip, Fayad Abu Shamala, told a Hamas rally on May 6, 2001, (attended by the then Hamas leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin) that journalists and media organizations in Gaza, including the BBC, are ‘waging the campaign [of resistance/terror against Israel] shoulder-to-shoulder together with the Palestinian people.’ The best the BBC could do in response to requests from Israel that they distance themselves from these remarks at the time, was to issue a statement saying, ‘Fayad’s remarks were made in a private capacity. His reports have always matched the best standards of balance required by the BBC.’ Indeed, today, three years later, the BBC is continuing to use Abu Shamala as much as ever. He was, for example, one of the BBC reporters in Gaza last month, who contributed to the BBC’s highly slanted reporting (on both the BBC English and Arabic services) of Israel’s operation to root out Hamas bomb-makers in Rafah in the southern Gaza.
Abu Shamala was by Johnston’s side when he came out of Gaza. Shouldn’t the BBC acknowledge that their ‘excellent’ senior Arabic service correspondent in Gaza who reports on Hamas is a close associate of Hamas? Indeed, shouldn’t the BBC’s senior Arabic correspondent in Gaza have no such affiliation at all? Or to put it another way, why should the British TV licence-fee payer subsidise a Hamas supporter broadcasting propaganda about Hamas under the guise of objectivity and detachment?
But it gets better.
Britain capitulates to get the Hamas bum-boy, toy-boy back.
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56527
Several reformed Muslims have started to speak out against the violence of Jihadis
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/sarfraz_manzoor/2007/07/reclaiming_our_religion.html
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/asim_siddiqui/2007/07/not_in_our_name.htm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/07/08/nrmuslim108.xml
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article2042408.ece
The British government, which has banned all mention of Islam or Muslims in connection with terrorism, now look like complete fucking imbeciles.
But it gets better.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=466942&in_page_id=1770
Recently, in response to the public backlash over the car bombs, the Muslim Council of Britain has moderated it’s demands and adopted a more conciliatory attitude. Do not be taken in by this, they will revert to type. Several prominent Socialist cretins, er – members of parliament, are pressing for the re-inclusion in relevent debates.
The government are complete imbeciles
As you rightly say “Britain, RIP”.
July 16th, 2007 at 12:29 am
Rasta, I’ve just sent a long post, but it appears to have gone to post-heaven, could you have a look please.
Many thanks.
J
July 16th, 2007 at 9:07 am
Thanks for finding the big one, Rasta.
You’ve hit the right spot focusing on Saud, Rasta. There are many, many links, congressional committees, think tanks etc, etc, saying the roots are in Saud.
The Bin laden family are personal friends of the Bush family.
Bush allowed senior members of the Bin Laden family to fly out of US immediately after 9/11.
Simple googling tells a lot!
Seems nothing much is being done about pretty much anything!, other than spilling US (and to a lesser extent) UK, blood and treasure. Other than a few western exceptions, Nato members contributions seem worthless, and UN in Lebanon UNIFIL seem to be negotiation on a platoon basis with hezbullah/hamas/ everyone else, a no “hit” policy, to save their rotten asses when/should the shiite hit the fan this summer. UN1701 was never any use, except as a symbol
Surely it’s time to use a bigger hammer on this nail.
July 16th, 2007 at 9:42 am
http://www.monies.cc/publications/saudi_finance.htm
July 16th, 2007 at 11:49 am
You have a very interesting blog. Please visit my blog madsufi.com, I intend to post more about the Wahhabi sect in the near future.
July 16th, 2007 at 1:23 pm
Excellent article Rastaman, and I agree about the Saudis. I never understood why we didn’t do anything about them right after September 11.
Jordan’s long comment is extremely in teresting, especially the UN and Soros connections.
I’ll take it one step further. I have information from a VERY reliable source, that Gordon Brown and Lord Murray Elder, who grew up together from childhood, were (and may still be) actually anti-semetic. That would fit in with what Jordan says in a very interesting way.
July 16th, 2007 at 2:17 pm
News you need on Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia,…
I never understood why we did not go after Saudi Arabia after September 11, 2001. The answer that is tossed about is that the Bush family are such good friends with the Saudi leaders. I never really bought that, but…
July 16th, 2007 at 5:24 pm
Hey, Rastaman. – Just tooling about, I found this image.
It might be appropriate for your previous post. (smile, snicker)
http://www.bushspeaks.com/img/headupass.jpg
Phuuleez, no comments on my research interests!
July 16th, 2007 at 5:36 pm
A war hero.
http://nhbiz.net/md11/Videos/War%20Hero.jpg
July 16th, 2007 at 7:39 pm
Debbie, thanks for the heads-up on Murray Elder.
Off the top, from a little googling, I would say your source is correct. Very correct!
Certain leading academic characters have written a complete load of crap concerning religious/historical things. It is clear they have no knowledge of history, which to discuss their favourite topics, must extend to at least 8,000bc, and probably earlier. They would also need a knowledge of “sacred geometry”, which contains many messages if you have the keys. They obviously don’t.
These people really piss me off, – full of pious words, hiding ignorance and mal-intent, backed by loads of petro-funds.
History can’t be re-written, archeology can’t be altered, star-signs can’t be misplaced.
They award Msc, Phd, etc, etc for bullshit writings.
Their appreciation of current socio/societal/religious/global concepts are totally biased, coming from where they do.
I’ll do more research.
I’m pissed that this is happening to trumpet fanfares.
July 16th, 2007 at 8:01 pm
Ernesto – that story is a load of made up bollocks (about the police)
July 16th, 2007 at 8:49 pm
The flight.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/062207A.shtml
July 16th, 2007 at 9:17 pm
LOL, nice picture, Jordon.
July 16th, 2007 at 11:51 pm
This link just about explains it all.
http://cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a091301bushbandar#a091301bushbandar
So, what’s going on? Something smells.
AQ is now stronger than it ever was, Bin Laden still lives, his family thrives. Saudis still finance terror/mosques/madrassas, nut-jobs still blow themselves and whomever, to pieces.
Where is the executive on this?
It looks like corruption, smells like corruption, tastes like corruption, – well it sure as hell is corruption.
Who is gonna step up and call it by its proper name?
July 17th, 2007 at 3:14 pm
Im glad to see you guys have woken up to the Bush/Bin Laden/CIA threat to your futures, only its kinda dooh, where do we go from here!
Who are your alternatives?
July 17th, 2007 at 3:37 pm
Good question. Who can we really trust when they’ve all proven to be liars? Someone says what the majority of us want to hear so that person gets elected and then does what he or she wants. It’s always been that way, which is why the very few actually good presidents we’ve had get their faces on our money.
July 17th, 2007 at 6:01 pm
Dizzy says “Who are your alternatives?”
What do you reckon, dizzy.
Seems “business” ties all the strings of the world together, and the political dance is for our benefit.
Take your sides, guys, here’s a common enemy. Unite behind my flag, and we’ll blow his balls off.
Ultimately it can’t be in the interests of the suppliers of hydrocarbons to ruin their own paying customers, – so……………..?
What do you think Dizzy?
July 17th, 2007 at 6:10 pm
Dizzy, I found the answer.
See next blog