ACLU Attacks Our Anti-Terror Efforts Again, + New Mexican Eruption
“The American Civil Liberties Union announced yesterday morning that it would sue a Boeing subsidiary in San Jose, Calif., federal court, alleging that the company helped the Central Intelligence Agency with “the forced disappearance, torture, and inhumane treatment” of three men the government suspected of terrorist involvement.”
This is about supposed “extraordinary rendition” practices, which the ACLU would love to shut down as a tool to combat terrorism. Plainly put, the Communistic ACLU wants to destroy America. This isn’t a rant, it’s plain fact. The founder of the ACLU was a Communist who openly stated that the purpose of his new organization was to bring America to its knees, and even though he’s long gone, his purpose continues on.
The complaint this time revolves around the wild claims of torture and abuse by three muslim terrorists. They are Binyam Mohammed, a British resident who was taken into custody in Pakistan and is now being held at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Station in Cuba; Abou Elkassim Britel, an Italian citizen, who was first apprehended in Pakistan and is currently being held in Morocco, and Ahmed Agiza, an Egyptian citizen, who while seeking asylum in Sweden (yes, another terrorist “asylum seeker”) was arrested by Swedish security police, handed over to CIA agents, shackled, drugged, and flown to Cairo from Stockholm, according to the suit.
Will someone tell me why the ACLU would be defending foreign terrorists if it were actually an organization concerned with OUR freedom and safety?
Every person in the United States who gives assistance of any kind to this cabal of traitors should be publicly spit upon and reviled.
One more reason to Join the movement to stop the ACLU!
Meanwhile, from Yahoo News, comes this look into the Mexican side of the amnesty argument… “The United States government is on the verge of approving a mass amnesty to millions of illegal aliens — a plan pushed aggressively by meddling Mexican officials who reap billions of dollars in remittances (illegal aliens’ earnings sent back to Mexico) without having to lift a finger to clean up their own country.”
The thanks we get for it is to have Miss USA booed and humiliated as she competed on stage in Mexico City, balloons full of piss thrown on our soccer players at a 2005 Mexican game, and in Guadalajara in 2004 during an Olympics qualification soccer match between the U.S. and Mexico, the stadium erupted in boos during the playing of “The Star-Spangled Banner.” Fans yelled “Osama! Osama!” as the U.S. was eliminated by Mexico and in Los Angeles, illegal aliens, mostly Mexicans, swarmed the streets waving Mexican flags and demanding that we give them a free ride to citizenship.
In 1848, one hundred and fifty nine years ago, we signed a treaty with Mexico at the end of the Mexican-American war that resulted in the purchase of California, Texas and New Mexico from Mexico. These areas were very sparsely populated and Mexico itself started the war by attacking Texas, which had already successfully seceded from Mexico 12 years before and subsequently applied for U.S. statehood. It was this application that prompted Santa Ana to attack Texas and the attack brought in our troops to protect a fledgling state.
Now the Mexicans claim that we “stole” their territory 159 years ago and they should have it all back.
Umm, no.
June 1st, 2007 at 2:00 am
The ACLU and Terror (Stop the ACLU)…
From Stop the ACLU AP: ACLU says Maricopa County violated TB patient’s rights The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit claiming Maricopa County officials have violated the rights of a quarantined tuberculosis patient for months by treat…
June 1st, 2007 at 3:05 am
You and I feel the same way about the ACLU. Another blogger has been hot on the ACLU, apparently they have pedophiles in their senior ranks. But hey, it just kids…
June 1st, 2007 at 5:39 pm
You might like to read this in connection with communism and the ACLU;
http://bnpandme.blogspot.com/2007/05/current-communist-goals-1963.html
Best,
G.
June 2nd, 2007 at 9:08 am
Too much agreement on this blog!! Most unsporting.
Apart from the last it does not say in that article if the US had the agreement of the governments of the countries from which these men were taken , if not, good for the ACLU I would say. Many are fed up with the way that the US seeks to impose its laws on the rest of the world by acts of dubious legality or completely one sided treaties. The ink is scarcely dry before these agreements, supposedly to deal with terrorists, are used to extradite businessmen for things done here or elsewhere which are not even illegal by our laws. There might be less protest if the US at least pretended to adhere to civilised rules at Guantanamo.
Agree on the amnesty, it’s insane. As with migration from poor countries here, even the law abiding simply bring their poverty with them, more overcrowding for no increase whatever in per capita income. I suspect recent reports of the way the US is dropping down the wealth league has a lot to do with Mexican migration.