Addendum To The Previous Post…
The primary argument against getting out of Iraq given us by the Bush administration is that if we do, Iraq will sink into civil war, which is what’s going on already anyway, and that will lead to total chaos in the Middle East.
Really? I think it’s very unlikely that all the other Arab countries will start fighting each other if the Iraqis escalate their current “disagreement”. They have no reason to and no reason has been given by Bush, only the assurance that it would happen. Given his record of lying about virtually everything, it’s too late now to expect us to take him at his word alone. But if the Mid-East did all go to war, will someone explain to me why that would be a bad thing instead of a good thing? The muslims are our enemies. No one disputes that. Yes, the oil companies would immediately raise the price of gas at the pump to new highs in a frenzy of profiteering but I can’t see the Bush crowd being very upset about that and it would be a whole lot better than us having to fight and die fighting jihadists. I would much rather see them all kill themselves, and expensive gasoline is a small price to pay for that.
No. If the Mid-East flared up into total war, I’d be cheering my lungs out. Let the Islamists destroy each other. Hell, yes.
The truth behind the Bush lie is still the same. He wants corporate America to own Iraq. That’s always been why we’re there. It could have been done, too, if he wasn’t such a lame-ass and gone in with no more of a plan than to beat the crap out of them and take over. No foresight.
It’s not liberal or leftist to want to stop the woundings and deaths of our young people in Iraq and stop the plundering of our treasury, it’s just against the plans of Big Money and Big Money doesn’t care how many suffer and die as long as the bucks keep rolling in. Blindly following this “leader” is not an act of patriotism, it’s an act of lazy stupidity that comes near to treason. What keeps it from being so is simply that stupid is irreparable.
The muslims will re-invent that wall to suit their own purposes just as they do everything else. The checkpoints will be focus points for attacks. Grenades will be constantly thrown over the wall. Tunnels will go under it and all the people in homes next to it will live in constant terror as enemies will keep randomly erupting from the earth.
Better that we build a 100-foot high wall around the White House with no exits.
I worry that my country will never recover from the damage George Bush has done to it, and to us.
April 21st, 2007 at 5:48 pm
Only a wall can avoid Muslims killing Muslims. Yeah, that beasty people.
No doubt: islamic people is the DENYING of the Humanity. And Iraqi people is doing pretty much than any other to show it world wide.
April 22nd, 2007 at 1:54 am
A reader at Right Truth said we should instigate a new policy. We should use crop dusters and spray the mosques and everything with pig blood. That would just make them mad, keep them out of their heaven. Maybe they would be like the wicked witch in the Wizard of Oz, “I’m melting!”
April 22nd, 2007 at 2:28 am
If it would convince them to quit being muslims I’d be all for it. The problem with this particular fantasy idea is that if it were actually done, the whole world would land on us like a ton of bricks. We would actually receive less flak if we nuked Iraq.
Alternatively, spraying the mosques in Europe and America would do a lot to drive them out of our countries. Likewise dipping every koran obtainable in bacon grease.
Fantasies should have some chance of becoming reality, however slight.