Iran May Have Overstepped At Last

President Bush accused Democrats yesterday of aiding the enemy in Iraq as a Senate bill calling for a troop withdrawal by next March appeared to be headed for passage.

With the vote expected today, Bush reiterated he will veto any bills that set a timetable for withdrawal.

The United Nations hit Iran with sanctions over the weekend to try and stop its nuclear program while Washington and London blame Iran for backing insurgents battling their forces in Iraq. Now Britain seeks international help to isolate Iran in a standoff over Irans capture of 15 military personnel and has gone to the UN. In response, Iran has now refused to release the female sailor as had been promised.

“This is not just a UK-Iran spat. This is Iran facing down a good deal of the international community,” the British government source said.

Britain published proof the Royal Navy sailors and marines were captured within Iraqi waters.

Teheran angered many in Britain by releasing video of the only woman crew member captured. Britain said parading the female sailor and other captured British personnel was completely unacceptable and it fears the sailors may have been coerced into appearing, and in Teheran, a small group of demonstrators outside the foreign ministry called for the sailors to be executed as spies.

The prisoners are legally Prisoners Of War and their public display and the letters are open violations of International Law. This is a clear Act of War.

The United States has called Iran’s behaviour ”reprehensible” and “odious”.

Okay, now let’s break all this down. Bush’s rhetoric, essentially calling all Democrats traitors, is not helpful but more than that, it’s a sign of his growing desparation that he would say something so grossly undiplomatic. Why is he desparate? After all, calling for a withdrawal one year from now doesn’t seem unreasonable. It is a civil war over there. The Iraqi Shiite police just got through joining in with a bunch of militants to go house to house killing Sunni men. The sectarian war rages on. Why then is he desparate?

Because the plan was, as I’ve repeatedly pointed out, to establish bases in Iraq to replace the ones Bush Senior got us booted out of in Saudi Arabia by attempting to vastly enlarge the areas they’d allowed us. There never was a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq because there is no intention to. Ever. We currently have 14 permanent bases in Iraq, which is the biggest oil plum imaginable.

Because Bush never once squared with the American public about the Plan and instead created a false scenario as an excuse for the invasion, he now finds himself unable to get honest and it’s hard to say which way the fallout would drop if he did so. So he’s stuck with refusing to budge and has been prodding Iran to give him an excuse to attack them with the support of the American people. Iran sees this maneuver and has been careful not to fall into the trap.

In Iran, there is a conflict between the religious zealots, the ayatollahs and imams, and a more moderate political base. It appears that the British sailor abduction was originally done to repress the Brits from inspecting cargoes but has escalated under the orders of the ayatollahs. The moderates see what’s coming and want the sailors released but the zealots want to push this to the limit and they are very likely creating the exact excuse Bush needs to attack Iran alongside the British and possibly the Israelis.

If Bush wants to keep this war going until at least the end of his tenure, he has no choice now but to expand it. I don’t think Congress will let it be otherwise.

3 Responses to “Iran May Have Overstepped At Last”

  1. Debbie Says:

    Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t see those 14 American bases in Iraq ANY time. We are already fighting Iran in Iraq. But you don’t hear anybody on the left talking about that. Iran would move right in and take over Iraq should we leave.

    I think Iran has stepped into a big pile of you know what this time, and they can’t figure out how to get it off their shoes without looking weak. They should never have taken those 15 and should never have used the female sailor. By not letting her go as they promised, and making her write another letter, they are really in trouble. I wonder what they are doing to her? Nothing good I’m sure.

  2. Rastaman Says:

    By not “seeing those 14 American bases”, do you mean “not ever leaving Iraq” or do you think they aren’t there? I assure you that they are, if the latter is what you meant, and a lot more besides. That link is 3 years old now. Here’s the latest:

    BAGHDAD — U.S. military commanders have prepared plans to consolidate American troops in Iraq into four large air bases as they look ahead to giving up more than 100 other bases now occupied by international forces, officers said. Eventually, U.S. units would end up concentrated at the four heavily fortified, strategically located hubs.

    That article also claims that “But they said the consolidation plan was not meant to establish a permanent U.S. military presence in Iraq.” No, of course not. Only until the oil runs out.

  3. Ernesto Ribeiro Says:

    OK, Dhimmi Blair: that’s your golden opportunity to make sure you’re really the new Churchill.

    No, just kidding: the old Winston NEVER will get soft with Islam.

    Just for remember: Churchill compared Islam to an infection 100 years ago. And now, Britain is dying sick. WHAT HE WOULD DO?

    DAMM IT!!! As Maggie Thatcher once said: “Let’s start a war.”

    If the West don’t react cuttting the Iranian filth hands, all the muslim scum will feel stronger.

    It’s time to erase that shit hole from hell.

    NUKE IRAN.

    “If you gonna die / die with your boots on”
    (Iron Maiden)

Leave a Reply

Check Spelling
Activate Spell Check while Typing