Why Liberalism Is A Mental Disease
Opponents unite to plot against BNP
Press Association
Saturday February 17, 2007 5:03 AM
Celebrities, politicians, trade unions and leaders of religious and ethnic groups are among those gathering to campaign against the British National Party (BNP).
Ah yes. Even in England there are Sean Penn imitators.
The Unite Against Fascism conference in central London will see former Specials musician Jerry Dammers and the Babyshambles join Northern Ireland Secretary Peter Hain, Muslim and Jewish leaders, students and gay rights campaigners to discuss how to combat the far right organisation.
Do any of those people sound like not just rabble rousers but the rabble themselves?
Delegates will discuss why communities should unite against the BNP, as well as strategies to stop the party gaining votes. Other themes will include how to defend multiculturalism, challenge homophobia and prevent the BNP gaining a platform in the media and education.
Homophobia is overrated. It means “Fear of homosexuals” when the reality is that people aren’t afraid of homosexuals, they may just not like them very much.
Mr Hain said: “Progressives have a moral duty to fight fascism wherever it rears its ugly head.
“Progressives” was what the Young Communists called themselves…”
“The Anti-Nazi League played a leading role in helping end the evil of the National Front. Now we must unite to combat the BNP racists and their ideology of hate – that is why it is important that we build Unite Against Fascism today.”
Dammers, who wrote the anti-racist song “Free Nelson Mandela”, said the BNP were like Daleks, because “no matter how many times they are defeated, they don’t get the message”.
It sounds like the muslims and their dhimmi slaves are getting worried about the growing power of the BNP. These nutjob liberals are the ones promoting fascism, not the BNP. They’re doing so by promoting the insanity of multiculturalism and the inroads of the Islamists, who are true fascists of the worst kind.
February 17th, 2007 at 8:47 am
The B.N.P. are the only political party to have the British peoples interest and welfare at heart
most politician’s are afraid of their own little currupt world from being destroyed
February 17th, 2007 at 11:33 am
Peter Hain was/is a well known turd-burglar (publicly outed himself), before his heterosexual “marraige”.
Also has a criminal record.
That says it all.
He may try for deputy Prime Minister after Blair goes.
How low can politics go?
February 17th, 2007 at 12:07 pm
BNP’s policies are unworkable but they are essential to democracy which requires a balance of opinions. Without the far right what would counter the far left with their politically correct absurdities, failure to live with realities of human nature and a guilt trip that has the white race down as responsible for all the world’s ills?
Nobody should be under an illusions about some of the leftist organisations. They are truly unpleasant and from the news it would seem they are far more likely to use violence as a tool than the right.
If mainstream politicians really want to see back of the BNP they should try addressing people’s quite legitimate concerns.
February 17th, 2007 at 12:09 pm
That comment about Hain illustrates precisely what is wrong with the BNP and some who support.
February 17th, 2007 at 5:31 pm
Including me, xoggoth. I support it.
I don’t try to take the middle-of-the-road approach. I try to take an honest approach, based on the experiences of my life. That said…
The BNP is fast becoming the most mainstream party in Britain. They want to return England to the English and boot out the non-English. Some of this is plain racism, some is patriotism. None of that matters. What matters is that they’re right about most of it, multiculturalism has been a total disaster for Europe, very much including Britain. I think they’d find advantage in toning it down a little further, it would gain them more support and therefor more power.
About homosexuality:
I don’t like being around homosexuals because I don’t like the way they act. I’ve lived in several communities that had large and vocal homosexual populations and their behavior was always extreme, without fail.
I don’t want homosexuals to have the right of adoption as too many of them are sexually attracted to children, and how do you tell the difference until it’s too late and the damage has been done? Beyond that, anyone who says that children raised by homosexuals will not be encouraged to become homosexuals themselves is mistaken. Why is this bad? Compile psychological profiles of any 50 homosexuals at random and see how they have more emotional and adjustment problems than the average person. I know they do because I’ve lived around them and experienced the truth of it. And then there’s AIDS.
Has anyone noticed that homosexual organizations ALWAYS side with the Leftists and the Communists and the Islamists? Virtually always. Does that make any red lights and alarms go off? It should. How many of you enjoy watching two men or two women kiss and grope each other in public?
There will always be homosexuals and they must be tolerated within society. Some make great contributions the same any straight person. They prefer social separation, gay bars for instance, just as straight people do. Like all of us, they have to abide by the laws of the land or suffer the consequences.
However, the law says No Marriage and there’s reasons for that, the most important being the welfare of children. You have to put the children first.
Most states, I think anyway (I may be wrong) have Domestic Partner laws now so that homosexuals can enjoy the same benefits as married couples. Now that they have that, they want to to have legal marriage so they can get hold of children. NO! Screw political correctness, all that’s done for us is to make everything worse and anyone who can’t see that hasn’t been paying attention. NO! Children are at enough risk in straight adoptions without compounding their danger.
Homosexual relationships do not produce children. They’re not designed to. Homosexual sex is all about pleasure. Having babies, parenthood, has no part in the sex act. Why, then, would any caring person want to push a helpless child into the middle of that?
February 17th, 2007 at 6:10 pm
Here’s a little backup for you on the subject. In one of these communities I mention, a homosexual couple, males, had a big Halloween party and invited everyone around. A lot of straight people showed up, with their children. I went too and the first things I noticed were K-Y jelly tubes all over the place, and a lot of young homosexuals. The next thing we all knew, the guys were grabbing each others asses, pants were coming down and these people were having sex in every convenient corner. In front of anyone and everyone including the children.
All the straights bailed out and left those people to their own devices. None of us ever attended another party at the home of known homosexuals.
You like that? Try this? Do you know what “rimming” is? It’s a homosexual expression. It’s when a guy licks out the asshole of another guy. Common practice. Do you want to hear more? No, you don’t.
I’m not anti, nor am I pro. I just don’t want to be around them. I don’t want to be around a lot of things that aren’t a part of my personal interests. They can live where and however they like as long as it’s peaceably. I just don’t want them getting hold of children.
February 17th, 2007 at 10:01 pm
As said by Pat Buchanan, Civilizations are not killed; they commit suicide. And civilization suicide is Liberalism.
February 18th, 2007 at 2:34 am
The BNP is disgusting. It’s a bunch of racist upper-class buisnessmen. They really don’t understand what Britian needs. The upper-class never knows what a country needs. Look at what happened in Germany with the Nazis.
February 18th, 2007 at 3:42 am
You apparently know nothing about the BNP other than that one of their primary goals is to get rid of the goddam muslims that are trashing Britain. The BNP is made up of every strata of British society.
In your latest post on your blog, DJ, you say that YOU will now coin the term “Islamic warfare”. I guess you don’t read much. Try doing a Google for “islamic warfare” before you stick your foot in it a third time.
February 18th, 2007 at 4:46 am
INCREDIBLE how every psychopatic has deliria of greatness…
…or simply megalomaniacs.
My prescription: Thorazine 900 ml and eletric shock treatment.
February 18th, 2007 at 11:14 am
What you describe is totally unacceptable (surely doing that in front of children is illegal in the US??) and you are perfectly entitled to feel that way generally.
However, the comment was not in the same reasonable terms. It was also quite specifically about Hain and he is not extreme. When the politically correct Met tried to prosecute an elderly Christian couple for leaflets they distributed last year, Hain publicly defended them saying that as it was not advocating violence it was a perfectly reasonable exercise of free speech. Much of Hain’s activism has been directed against the exreme intolerance in Islamic countries or Zimbabwe or as promoted by gangster rap.
I dislike your frequent promotion of the BNP. While I sympathise with the great many who support it simply because their genuine concerns are not addressed by mainstream parties, one does not have to go beyond its last manifesto to see they are a racist party in the proper dictionary sense of the word. Some of the people starting to frequent this site as a result are totally barking.
I intend to remove the link to here from my site as I do not want my two visitors to think I approve it. I am quite sure none of your visitors were ever remotely interested in my mostly nonsensical whitterings anyway.
February 18th, 2007 at 12:04 pm
Well, this debate started, it would seem, by my comment on the turd burglar, Peter Hain.
Peter Hain is a British Member of Parliament.
Lets examine his voting record on a few pertinent issues.
This bill sought to reduce the age for legal buggery. Hain voted to reduce the age from 18 to 16 years of age.
This vote relates to a Lords amendment to deny adoption rights to same sex couples. The vote is to do-away with the Lords amendment, ie, promote equal adoption rights to gay and lesbian couples.
Hain voted to give gay and lesbian couples equal adoption rights as heterosexual married couples
Hain even gave a speech promoting the rights of same-sex couples, moving their relationships to
new levels
This vote related to a motion to repeal section 119 of the Local Government Act 1986, which states that
“(1) A local authority shall not:
(a) intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality;
(b) promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship.”
Edward Leigh proposed an amendment to the bill. The amendment removed clause 119 from the bill under discussion. Therefore, those voting aye in this division wanted Section 2A of the Local Government Act 1986 to remain in force.
The House divided: Ayes 77, Noes 368.
Hain voted No on this occasion therebye voting to allow councils, and UK state schools to promote homosexuality within schools as an accepted practice!!
Of interest in all the above is the voting of Labour (left) promoting turd burglars rights, and Conservative (right) opposing them. This confirms Rastas above statements concerning “left favor queersâ€
Concerning his honesty in political practice, he will change views in order to advance his personal agenda
in this interview he blasts Bush and Iraq, having previously been a loud and vocal supporter of the Iraq policy, having voted in cabinet for the pro Bush/Blair position. His reason was to enhance his standing with the left to enable his attempt at the deputy leadership of the labour party.
If you want to follow up on Hain, try this link, and also this link
I consider my case of utter disgust for this person to be proven beyond doubt.
That this level of profound moral turpitude is so common in political life causes me great distress.
The political left in the UK are, without a doubt, the major reason for the current malaise in UK society.
February 18th, 2007 at 12:07 pm
Rasta, I’ve just sent a long post, which seems to have gone to “post heaven”
February 18th, 2007 at 12:17 pm
xoggoth
I suggest you use some of the links contained in my post, (should Rasta find it) to research the voting records of certain MPs.
You may be surprised at what is really happening in the UK, are who are, in fact, the problems.
You rightly sympathise with the VAST MAJORITY of middle class voters, who despair of ever having their voices heard. The current Gov was elecyed by less than 30% of the population.
A relection of public interest in political corruption, you may say.
The solution to force a re-think would be for every ballot paper to have a box for voting in addition to the candidates, which says “NON OF THE ABOVE”. That Way, instead of not voting in disgust, as many do, the MAJORITY of the electorate would be able to call for a total rethink on the direction that this Septic Isle is taking
February 18th, 2007 at 12:19 pm
Well, this debate started, it would seem, by my comment on the turd burglar, Peter Hain.
Peter Hain is a British Member of Parliament.
Lets examine his voting record on a few pertinent issues.
This bill sought to reduce the age for legal buggery. Hain voted to reduce the age from 18 to 16 years of age.
This vote relates to a Lords amendment to deny adoption rights to same sex couples. The vote is to do-away with the Lords amendment, ie, promote equal adoption rights to gay and lesbian couples.
Hain voted to give gay and lesbian couples equal adoption rights with heterosexual married couples
Hain even gave a speech promoting the rights of same-sex couples, moving their relationships to
new levels
This vote related to a motion to repeal section 119 of the Local Government Act 1986, which states that
“(1) A local authority shall not:
(a) intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality;
(b) promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship.”
Edward Leigh proposed an amendment to the bill. The amendment removed clause 119 from the bill under discussion. Therefore, those voting aye in this division wanted Section 2A of the Local Government Act 1986 to remain in force.
The House divided: Ayes 77, Noes 368.
Hain voted No on this occasion therebye voting to allow councils, and UK state schools to promote homosexuality within schools as an accepted practice!!
Of interest in all the above is the voting of Labour (left) promoting turd burglars rights, and Conservative (right) opposing them. This confirms Rastas above statements concerning “left favor queersâ€
Concerning his honesty in political practice, he will change views in order to advance his personal agenda
in this interview he blasts Bush and Iraq, having previously been a loud and vocal supporter of the Iraq policy, having voted in cabinet for the pro Bush/Blair position. His reason was to enhance his standing with the left to enable his attempt at the deputy leadership of the labour party.
If you want to follow up on Hain, try this link, and also this link
I consider my case of utter disgust for this person to be proven beyond doubt.
That this level of profound moral turpitude is so common in political life causes me great distress.
The political left in the UK are, without a doubt, the major reason for the current malaise in UK society.
February 18th, 2007 at 12:27 pm
Rasta, I’ve just re-sent the long post, but it seems to have gone the same way of the first one.
Can you ressurect it from “post heaven”
Best Regards.
Jordon.
Xoggoth referring to my first post (no 2). Where is the connection, other than the one YOU made, between my content – and the BNP?
My long post explains my disgust with that man and his party, and the political direction of society. If you want to make connections beyond my criterior, then it is your doing, and your mistake, your blurred perception, and your problem.
February 18th, 2007 at 4:22 pm
Found them, Jordon. Twice.
Xoggoth, I gave you a link to help drive a little traffic to your blog because you seemed to be on the same page as Islamanazi regarding Islam. This blog is linked on a lot of sites whose content is not always in agreement with this one on various issues. What matters most is our stand on Islam.
I was never able to find my link on your site so if you take mine off, I don’t think anyone will notice anyway.
It is exactly my stand on Islam which is behind my support of the BNP. If you come out against the BNP, you come out FOR the Islamic conquest of Britain. It’s as simple as that.
Most of us are racist to some degree and anyone who says otherwise is either a liar, a hypocrite or simply doesn’t know their own mind. We all prefer to live among our own ethnic kind. It’s simply more comfortable. Most of us, regardless of our race, feel superior to those of other races. It’s just human nature. Men feel superior to women. Women feel superior to men.
So when the BNP is accused of being racist, xoggoth, I DON’T GIVE A SHIT. Ok? I agree that they probably are. I don’t care. It doesn’t MATTER.
What matters is that they want to save Britain from the Islamists. That’s what matters.
All the spewing and fomenting and fulminating against the BNP by the other parties is simply because the BNP is gaining in power and it scares the crap out them that they might loses their cushy, well-paid jobs of being public parasites to someone in the BNP who might actually DO SOMETHING for Britain.
February 18th, 2007 at 8:01 pm
ISLAM IS RACIST
The racism in the Koran
“White faces will be saved and black faces will be damned.”
3.106 ” On the day when some faces shall turn white and some faces shall turn black; then as to those whose faces turn black: Did you disbelieve after your believing? Taste therefore the chastisement because you disbelieved.
3.107 “And as to those whose faces whitened, will be in mercy with Allah.”
Remember that Arabs consider themselves white..
Muhammed’s antipathy to black people is also in the hadith where he calls them “raisin heads†(1:662; 9:256) .
Mohammed also kept black people as slaves.
“a black slave of Allah’s Apostle was sitting on the first step” (6:435) .
Muslim propagandists often try to recruit black people to their cult by saying Muhammed was black, but there are numerous references to his white skin in the hadith. No big deal, but it is typical of how muslims will lie for their cause.
They covet influence with black people by claiming that islam is the black man’s religion and that muhammed was black, but they lie to convert.
The true feelings of muslims about black people are seen in the genocide of Darfur. The nazislamics genociders are white Arabs Muslim exterminating and pursuing black Christians and Animists.
Source: http://www.coranix.com/beastycult.htm
That’s the deeds of the religion created by a mass killer torturer, kidnapper robber, pedophile rapist… and racist.
Mohammed was the scum of the Humanity. The worst kind of human being that could exist.
February 18th, 2007 at 8:34 pm
Whoops! By Peter Hain I was referring to Peter Tachell, always get those two confused (senility). Naturally I am in favour of ANY INSULT, no matter how gratuitous, to government ministers!
Rastaman, we need to oppose Islamism which I completely agree is a malign and idiotic creed and currently the biggest threat to our society but there is another party (UKIP) in the UK which is also opposed to the challenges to British/Western societyand is in favour of British culture and I will be actively supporting that. Joined recently.
I would certainly do my totally negligible best to oppose attempts to legally outlaw the BNP. As I have already said, they provide an essential counter to the left, are a voice for people who have been ignored for too long and a valuable threat to marginal seats that might make the main parties think twice before they indulge their PC loonacies.
But BNP policies are not just aimed at Islam, their own policies
(http://www.bnp.org.uk/candidates2005/manifesto/manf4.htm items 1and 6) would remove all discrimination laws, making it completely legal to refuse a black man a job solely on grounds of colour and moreover perfectly legal to tell him to bugger off as they don’t employ niggers. Do you seriously want to actively promote that when there are alternatives? There is no such thing as “as as simple as that”. If the BNP was in charge and a couple of million black men were unjustifiably refused jobs, where would they turn? – either to crime or to the alternative – Islam. One of the best counters to Islam is to promote the benefits of our own society and you don’t do that by abritrary exclusion.
I am not going to actively support crap like that nor any site that does. (I bet they are losing sleep over that, NOT!) Nothing personal Rastaman, I think some of your political analysis is very astute and and well worth reading and I have not so far detected a second hand opinion.
Jordon. Maybe the turd burglar expression gave me the wrong impression, I agree with most of what you say. I certainly ain’t no leftie, I loath socialism for the same reason I loath Islam, I believe in individual freedom. Neither do I agree with the representation of homosexuality as “normal” in schools, but what adults do in private, when it does not significantly affect anyone else is their own business. To me that is what individual freedom is all about.
Perhaps this is an age thing, I was very homophobic in my youth. The only person in my life I threatened with a knife was a chap who made advances. Nowadays I just find it simpler not to think about it. Actually I don’t seem to think about sex much at all anymore. Doh!
February 18th, 2007 at 8:59 pm
Last first, I don’t correlate being repelled by homosexual behavior to being afraid of homosexuals. Therefor I don’t accept the use of the word “homophobic” in regard to that. If a person is genuinely afraid of being in the same room as a homosexual, then yes, it applies. Otherwise it’s spin doctoring, like using the word “gay”, which means happy, to mean homosexual. That little gem was created by a fat little San Francisco “turd burglar” to, once again, put a nice spin on something that most of society instinctually rejects.
Now. UKIP and the BNP. Not being a Brit, I know little, actually, of British politics other than having researched the BNP and the leanings and machinations of Blairs party. I know nothing about UKIP, but trust me, because of this interchange I’ll be well educated on the subject before the weekend is over. In the meantime, if UKIP is truly and aggressively working to reverse the inflow of muslims, stop them in their tracks, force them to become part of mainstream society or leave, and put an end to multiculturalism in Britain, as well as reverse the trend of laws to take away your freedoms, then I’ll promote them here.
I take a harder line than you do, I think. I see Britain as teetering on the brink now, and I think drastic remedies are needed now. I would frankly prefer to see a Christian-fascist government in place that was rectifying the mess now, and then deal with its other excesses later, than keep watching the UK go steadily downhill into muslim Hell.
Getting rid of the muslims is first priority regardless of the cost. It’s too late for niceties. Really. It is.
February 18th, 2007 at 9:25 pm
Rasta, thanks for finding the posts.
Getting rid of immigrants is far more difficult than you may think. It’s a long legal process, started 40 years ago.
It will involve many, many links, some to other countries, and a lot of reading.
I have the backbone in mind, but exploring the details, the characters, and their motivations will take time.
A long story of criminal betrayal, at international level.
In the next few days perhaps………………
February 19th, 2007 at 12:32 am
Could someone explain to me, how in what is supposed to be a democratic country how something so undemocratic as to try disrupting a perfectly legal party from standing in elections?
Especially noting that muslims were mentioned attending this Marxist meeting of minds, am i correct remembering that in world war two that the grand mufti of palestine and his muslim Hanjar division ss troops were right there by hitlers side aiding him with the extermination process which they did with gusto in Yugoslavia of thousands of jews serbs and gypsies?
Is it not also a fact all islamic states are totalitarian regimes, and were muslims to get the upper hand here this would be run on the very same
lines?
The left think themselves very clever with their marx mohammed pact, but many of us have researched and spreading the word in whichever area we live in.
The muslim brotherhood with an employee in our foreign office mokbal ali are nothing but fascists yet they appear acceptable to this lousy government.
Anyone that has’nt read ” THE PROJECT” do so and the lefts involvement will become clear although they themselves are too stupid to see how they are being used.
google “the muslim brotherhoods project” this is their goals laid out to conquer europe, they are today busy buying up property and land in the south east with agreements only re-sell to muslims anyone knowing about islam this land then becomes what they term muslim land forever.
Rome and Spain they still to this day call them muslim lands, that must be taken back.
We have an up hill task ahead of us all, when this conquest is being aided by the european union, we have no border controls nor will we ever while the politicians in westmister are there unchallenged,
Eurabia code can be seen at the gates of vienna blog site,
The brussels journal well worth the viewing islamic banking in Britain, on both the above sites are excellent, reports on everything that our politicians and media would rather we did not know.
The huge mosque to be built in Londonistan look into the group deeply that are at this time in Dewsbury, funded from saudi arabia a group that practise the deobandi the taliban ideology google TABLIGHI JAMAAT they were formed in Pakistan a very extreme group and very secretive.
This nation is a long way down the road to islam with dhimmi politicians, police force, councillers etc.
Unions and anyone they can con, can march untill their feet fall off i listen to Dr Patrick Soohkdeo an ex muslim a man that knows the muslim mind,
His briefings at http://www.isic.-centre.org should be taken note of they go back to the early 90s when most of us were completely unaware of the threat within.
what i ask is what were our politicians doing this guys writings were known to the government, the telegraph had to pull one of his articles last year when he warned of sharia law, i’m happy to say the bnp site wrote about the guy and did not remove his words.
RING ANY BELLS? THEY WILL MOVE INTO THE SPINE OF THE COUNTRY AND ONCE THAT IS COLONIZED WILL SPREAD OUTWARDS, THEY WILL OPEN SHOPS AND BUSINESSES, HEALTH CENTRES ETC AND WILL DRIVE OUT ALL NON MUSLIMS, CHURCHES WILL BE DESTROYED AND THEY HAVE, BEEN BUT COVERED UP!
ADDING IT CAN’T HAPPEN HERE? PAKISTAN ,AFGHANISTAN BOTH WERE CHRISTIAN COUNTRIES ONCE! AND THEY THOUGHT THE SAME.
The pace of change is speeding up very much so, with islam it’s not numbers that matter it’s how quickly and cleverly DHIMMITUDE is taking over and by looking about this country it’s doing very well.
Little dhimmis are being educated into islam in primary schools and that comes from the EU. LET THEM TAKE THE MINDS OF CHILDREN AND THEY WIN!
SCHOOL DHIMMI BOX WILL CONTAIN, COMPASS, QUR’AN, CLOTH FOR WASHING, PRAYER MAT. AT ONE SCHOOL FOR CHRISTIAN CHILDREN THEY EVEN WEAR ISLAMIC CLOTHING NOW ANYONE THAT REFUSES TO BELIEVE IN THE ISLAMIFICATION OF BRITAIN BEING WELL UNDERWAY THEN YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM!!
February 19th, 2007 at 9:58 pm
Well said, Veronica.
February 20th, 2007 at 5:24 am
If people think that the Lib/lab/con can save this country from the islamic/multicultural nightmare it would be a sad waste of wishful wonderment, afterall it was those criminals who created this mess to be begin with. The only answer in a Nationalist (non-violent) revolution lead by the British National Party. Joined ultimately by our friends on the rest of mainland Europe.
p.s.
no more brothers wars!
February 27th, 2007 at 2:16 am
rasta, i’ve always thought the word ‘homophobia’ was a completely idiotic little buzzword….the ‘homo’ part means ’same’…as in ‘homogeneous’ and ‘homosexual’ (same sex)
so, it actually means ‘a morbid fear of those who are the same as you’
…and this is what’s bandied about almost as a scientific term
great site and opinions…i’ve just been reading it for about an hour…at first i thought you were american and then british
judging by your support of the BNP, which i take it is a truly conservative british political party, i’m really gobsmacked! i didn’t think there were any real conservatives existing in britain! it’s heartening to see the opposition to the status quo rising over there too!
(i’m an aussie/american mix living in sydney and in contact with both aussies and americans socially and i saw your link on pommygranate ..and plan to be back pretty often)
February 27th, 2007 at 3:53 am
Really? Pommygranate linked to me? I’m honored. I will definitely return the favor.
Glad to hear from one more Non-dhimmi. We’re waking up the civilized world.
February 27th, 2007 at 8:15 am
well, actually, i should clarify…i saw your homepage link on your post there…but pommy’s pretty good…i think he’s coming round …you might be a little radical for him just yet..but we’ll get him suitably right-brained if he keeps reading the facts
believe me, i’ve been a foot-soldier waiting for the army to gather forces for a long time now! cradle-to-grave conservative from a cradle-to-grave conservative family …vive la resistance!